Tuesday, July 5, 2011
The Tree of Life by Terence Malick - An Interpretation
That being said, I did approach the movie with some expectations. I expected it to be great as I have enjoyed everything Terence Malick has done and respect him as a film maker and a thinker. I have always considered his films to be like tracks on an album rather than entirely separate entities. Somehow, even though the individual expressions and characters of each movie span different times and spaces, each movie explores the same themes with the same motifs. As if to say, throughout Western civilization (as we could at least put that time limit on them all), human beings have struggled with understanding the world around them in these terms.
So which terms? I feel that many of his characters are often caught between two binaries. Their stories (however subtle) are their struggle to find a place and a relationship between these polarities. The two I see most often, and I suppose they could even be conflated into one are: Nature vs. Civilization and Love (or Free Will) vs. Duty (often to civilization).
By all accounts, Malick is a Romantic. The pace of his movies are meditative as is the silence and the choice to let the setting and land of the film speak and breathe as if they were a character. The beauty of the natural world holds a certain truth for him and his characters are often taking refuge amongst it. There they find a unity in stark contrast to the broken world they are running from.
I also happen to be a Romantic to an ever shifting degree. Malick's films speak to me then and I suppose they are the sort of thing you either hear or you don't. Good film/Bad film and Like/Dislike don't apply so much as what is Malick saying and do you hear him?
For me it has always been loud and clear.
So there I was in the dark of the theater ready to drink in this film.
Almost immediately, the film opens with a binary: "There are two ways through life... The way of Nature and the way of Grace," says the voice of the mother in the film. She goes on to explain Nature as this force that is always trying to please itself. I wish I could remember exactly the way she puts it, but a deeper understanding of the two sides arose from the rest of the movie which I will explain shortly.
I was struck. This is different. This is not more of the same Malick. Nature was being cast in this selfish and greedy light.
The movie opens with a general sense of cloudiness. We slosh back and forth between childhood scenes and adult scenes with Sean Penn representing the grown up son of Brad Pitt. There's scenes of an older Mother and Father receiving news of their son's death as well (Sean Penn's brother). There's a bit of confusion but then ultimately we get taken to the actual beginning, the beginning of everything.
There is a long sequence of images that represent the creation of the universe and the subsequent evolution of life on Earth which carries us to the specific evolution of life in the specific family of the O'Briens. This is the story that the movie follows. The evolution of Jack and the dynamics of his family.
Throughout much of the movie there are shots of the camera looking up at trees. These are paralleled by similar upward-looking shots of the office building landscape in the large city where the adult Jack works. To me this spells out a shocking revelation for the movie and for Malick as a director/thinker. Civilization is Nature . Civilization is an extension of the same force behind Nature, that selfish, self-centered force that allows for everything to propagate. At one point adult Jack sits silently and pensively with his colleagues in a high office building. As one man in the room claims, "Everyone is getting greedy," the camera slowly zooms in on the city below through the office window. This is a primal force at work. The selfish drive to accumulate and maintain.
But nowhere in the movie is Nature and Grace more clearly highlighted than in the ways the Mother and Father interact with the children. The Mother representing Grace and the Father representing Nature. If my memory serves me correctly, the mother's name is Mary. "Hail Mary, full of Grace."
The O'Brien family is a small branch off of the larger trunk of evolution and of life; therefore, the way of Nature still exists amongst them as they are a fractal of the larger whole. The Father is always trying to teach his sons through tough love the ways to get ahead in the world: responsibility, conformity, selflessness, all of which can be boiled down to a numbness: a lack of emotional recognition and responsibility. But, in the face of Nature, humans have developed Grace: a force of compassion, inter-subjectivity, understanding and relation. The Mother exudes this throughout the film. She is a gravity away from the enculturation the Father is always pushing.
The Father winds up being the saddest character of the movie: always at a distance from the real life of the family: a practical arm's length away from the foundation of love and understanding that the mother offers. Always running and searching, he always misses out on the human connection taking place between brother and brother, mother and sons.
But is Grace really a solely human force? I believe Malick tells us very subtly that it is not. During the sequence that represents the evolution of life on the planet, we hang on an extended vignette regarding a couple of dinosaurs. A helpless baby dinosaur lies ill beside a river. An obviously predatory dinosaur approaches. It places its foot on the head of the baby dinosaur. It observes for a long while and then lets go and moves on. Grace expresses itself here in the most primal existences.
Grace, therefore, exists externally. It exists as a primal force that runs along side Nature. And as the Mother clearly states, it is for us to choose. Maybe humans have been (and still are) the most capable of such a choice.
Let's hope so.
On a personal note, I sat in the theater absolutely mesmerized. Absolutely every single scene in that movie was in some form an analog to my own childhood. It was like watching home movies. Even the minutest details, for example, the sense of relief and celebration that coursed through the Mother and her children when the Father went traveling for his job, was entirely familiar to me. I imagine that these scenes are a representation of Malick's childhood as well, and therefore I see why I have always connected to his films, and a great curiosity arises in the fact that we have come to see the world with similar eyes. Was it because of our childhood?
In terms of cinematic accomplishment, the representation of the passage through childhood is like nothing ever rendered on film previously. Malick's representations, the fisheye lens of infancy, the focus on the way women adjust their hemlines and how it suddenly becomes more apparent in adolescence, strike a deep chord in me. The best actors in the film wind up being the toddlers as they can express nothing else besides their toddlerness. Every twenty minutes I would gasp at how much I was absorbing of these characters from the minimal offering on the screen.
The film opens with a quote from the book of Job. It is the last sequence of Job where God, in what I interpret as a snarky sarcasm, asks Job where he was while God was creating the universe. If Job thinks he knows so well and understands so much, he is forgetting that his knowledge is based on the foundations of an existence which only God has created. We are merely a branch of the tree of life then, and that understanding leads to a humility which leads to the acknowledgment of Grace’s existence and that to a sense of trust in it. As the Mother also says, “Unless you love, your life will flash by.”Unless we open ourselves to Grace, we will live blindly and arrogantly. We will will live wrapped in greed.
I left the film quite shaken. I felt a true paradigm shift had taken place. (Some day, maybe on this blog maybe elsewhere, I can finally explore my understanding of the following claim: "The only cure to postmodernism is the incurable illness of Romanticism." Did Malick just finally help me understand how Romanticism is both a cure and an illness?) In the old Nature vs. Civilization binary, I clearly sided with Nature. But now I side with Grace and I have no problem with seeing Nature as this greedy force now that the perspective has been place before me. So why this initial misconception? What lies in Nature that initially seems like Grace if that indeed is what has resonated with me all along? There is still a beauty and balance to the natural world that seems to contrast the injustice, immorality and violence of civilization. Is it just that we are so far removed from Nature? We see the violence of civilization because it is the matrix to which we belong most wholly, but from such a vantage point Nature looks unified and peaceful. Or maybe, if dinosaurs can offer each other Grace, the beauty and balance of Nature is a whisper of Grace which resides ever in potential, waiting to be birthed, to be branched and sprouted, like leaves on the tree of life.
Saturday, June 18, 2011
Asspiring unto the Crown upon the Ocean of Nectar

Levees break in Kansas City(Oz=Kansas=Heartland=Heart Chakra)
Gamma Cancri is a star system in the constellation Cancer. It has the traditional name Asellus Borealis (Latin for "northern donkey colt").




The North is generally identified with the Heavens or the Throne/Home of the Gods, the Eternal world of Spirit. The Northernmost part of planet Earth is inhabited by Penguins.

Kether the Crown is where totality rests is in its unmanifested state. The Fool Tarot Trump is the first expression or thought in Gods mind to create anything and become manifest. All the Aces of the Tarot are given to the Sphere of Kether. Ace Ventura, the Adventure to Heaven.
The Fool Tarot Trump is given to the First Path of Creation as it Joyfully bursts from the Unmanifested Sphere of Kether GOing towards the manifested state. The Fool connects Kether- the Crown to Chokmah-Wisdom. Joy,Comedy, Lunacy, Laughter, Madness, and senselessness/trance are connected with the nature of this Trump/Aspect of our Soul.

This card is numbered 0, this is perfect as the Fool represents the primary beginings of every-thing, that is everything in its shared state of becoming. This primary state or first premises of all eternity- is the Joy/Comedy/Cosmic giGGle of co-creation of reality through Love. Aleister Crowley noted said this about the Holy Joy of the Fool.
The Fool is also deeply rooted in the Green Man/Holy Madman of Spring. Aleister Crowley makes this association clear in the Book of Thoth.
The "Green Man" of the Spring Festival. "April Fool." The Holy Ghost.
"This tradition represents the original idea adapted to the under- standing of the average peasant. The Green Man is a personification of the mysterious influence that produces the phenomena of spring. It is hard to say why it should be so, but it is so: there is a connection with the ideas of irresponsibility, of wantonness, of idealization, of romance, of starry dreaming."
The Fool stirs within all of us at the return of Spring, and be cause we are a little bewildered, a little embarrassed, it has been thought a salutary custom to externalise the subconscious impulse by ceremonial means."

"The connection between foolishness and holiness is traditional. It is no sneer that the family nitwit had better go into the church. In the East the madman is believed to be "possessed", a holy man or prophet. So deep is this identity that it is actually embedded in the language. "Silly" means empty-the Vacuum of Air-Zero-"the silly buckets on the deck". And the word is from the German selig, holy, blessed. It is the innocence of the Fool which most strongly characterizes him. " - Crowley, Book of Thoth
The Fool in us and the Tarot Comes before all as the 0 or primary state of being but when we are KKlimbing and returning to Heaven from Earth, the Fool is the final/Northernmost Card and Path in our Journey from the bottom of the tree as we approach Heaven/Godhead.

Being that Jim Carrey is a strong resonator of the first premises Fool/Joy/Comedy/Cosmic giGGle, it is perfect we see him arising alongside Penguins which are beings that live in the northernmost TIP of the Planet.

In Bruce Almighty we see Jim Carrey, the Fool, having returned to norTh/Throne of the Eart learning how to Co-Create with God. This is about our remembering of our Soul-Nature, that is beyond form, time, and all other conditions. When culture resonates with the Fool/throNe/North this is a beautiful sign of our return to Heaven, Starhood - Godhood. Were all getting our Thrones and Crowns back.
Green Man Jim Carrey at the North Pole as the Grinch

"THE FOOL is the negative issuing into manifestation; THE UNIVERSE is that manifestation, its purpose accomplished, ready to return."
- Aleister Crowley, the Book of Thoth
"Each human being is an element of the cosmos, self-determined and supreme, co-equal with all other gods"
- Aleister Crowley, The Law is for All

JC as a resonator of Fool Consciousness arriving back at the Northern Throne with the Penguins is a beautiful narrative of our return home to Soul/Star consciousness.
I realized while Skyping with Jim @syncwinnnipeg about my first ever Synchromysticism presentation here in NY on July 15th, that this was a GO date, and resonator of Cosmic Ti69er and Hunny/ and PO(First father)oh Bear. Jim informd me that 7=G and 15=O making 7/15 spelling GO! This is the date that everything GOes UP.
I later realized that I booked my event at /Root Cafe which is at 60 Main Street New Paltz. 60 looks just like the word GO too.

When we ask ourselves who is telling who to GO, we realize that all begins and ends with US, and we acknowledge our C0-Creative union with everything.
Crowley was once in a foolish trance, and let the deity Hadit-who is understood to represent the Star in all of us speak through himself.
"I am the flame that burns in every heart of man, and in the core of every star."
"Come unto me" is a foolish word: for it is I that GO"
Hadit is symbolized by a Red Dot which reminds me of the single Jupiterian Red Eye/Red Dot/Balloon on the poster for the new Winnie the Pooh Movie. GO and 50 entraining with KeaNeo reeves in Speed, alongside Dennis Hopper who is also in Easy Rider. By seas of Hunny do do we receive the Flood and return to Heaven.
"THE FOOL is the negative issuing into manifestation; THE UNIVERSE is that manifestation, its purpose accomplished, ready to return." - Crowley, the Book of Thoth
And nothing is the only thing you ever seem to have"
Only time will tell if I'll allow
The scenery around to eat me alive
I want to sleep for weeks like a dog at her feet
Even though I know it won't work out in the long run
So I burn down the walls, breathe like a shadow
Those arms I once knew hold me like ghosts
I learn how to speak forgotten language
I fall in the sea but forget how to swim
When anything that's anything becomes nothing that's everything
And nothing is the only thing you ever seem to have
But only time will tell if I'll allow
The scenery around to eat me alive
I want to sleep for weeks like a dog at her feet
Those arms I once knew hold me like ghosts
I learn how to speak defeated language
I fall in the street as I howl at the moon
When anything that's anything becomes nothing that's everything
And nothing is the only thing you ever seem to have
Love- Kevin
Thursday, May 26, 2011
The Brotherhood of the Screaming Abyss
Dennis is raising funds in order to independently publish his memoir about his life with Terence and their ideas. Check out his Kickstarer page to contribute.
The Brotherhood of the Screaming Abyss by The BotSA
Saturday, May 21, 2011
Birthing the Last Judgement via Arnold Schwarzenegger
Arnold Swarzenegger, Children, and the Last Judgement
Friday, May 20, 2011
Amondawa tribe lacks abstract idea of time, study says
The Amondawa language has no word for "time", or indeed of time periods such as "month" or "year".The people do not refer to their ages, but rather assume different names in different stages of their lives or as they achieve different status within the community.
But perhaps most surprising is the team's suggestion that there is no "mapping" between concepts of time passage and movement through space.
Ideas such as an event having "passed" or being "well ahead" of another are familiar from many languages, forming the basis of what is known as the "mapping hypothesis".
The Amondawa have no words for time periods such as "month" or "year"But in Amondawa, no such constructs exist.
Full Article

